header-logo header-logo

Law firms have their say on keeping clients happy

20 October 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Customer service and having a good reputation online are as important as resolving a legal matter satisfactorily, law firms increasingly believe

Some 41% of firms agreed with the above statement, when surveyed by independent law firm marketing collective First4Lawyers for its 2021 White Paper, Making your customers happy.

More than half the firms (55%) use review and comparison sites, although only 47% actually encouraged clients to post a review, only 24% responded to every review and 13% only responded to positive ones.

First4Lawyers managing director Qamar Anwar said: ‘Clients will usually be unable to assess the quality of your legal work, but they can judge the service they receive and are increasingly happy to write about it online.

‘This means customer service needs to be of equal importance. Getting new work without a strong online reputation, which is heavily influenced by service quality, is only going to get harder.

‘The issue of customer service and feedback is only going to get bigger – there’s no point closing your eyes and hoping it will go away. Law firm marketing has rapidly become digital first and you need to take control of what is being said about your firm online. There are practical consequences too – not responding to reviews can affect your website’s page rankings.’

Only two-thirds of firms provided fee earners with customer training, although 86% required fee earners to adhere to service standards. More than half (56%) say their firms understand the customer journey and have mapped out all their interactions with the customer, with a communications plan for each stage.

The research highlighted potential for improvement, for example, only 53% nominate an agreed point of contact from the off, and 61% of PI firms but only 46% of general consumer firms agree costs from the start.

Half the law firms said they take contact details in a consistent manner but only a minority of firms mentioned other customer service practices such as agreeing the format for communication and frequency of contact.

PI firms in particular are responding to demands for out-of-hours opening, with 52% offering services both in the evenings and weekends, while 48% track how often follow-ups convert into business, compared to just 28% of other firms.

The research was conducted by IRN Research among 100 law firms, split between personal injury and general consumer practices. View and download the White Paper here

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll