header-logo header-logo

15 October 2019 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7860 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Law in 101 words

9455
Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary, by Roderick Ramage

And & or

Sometimes ‘and’ and ‘or’ must be construed contrary to their normal meanings. In Chichester Diocesan v Simpson (1944) the HL decided that the ‘or’ in a testamentary disposition of residue to ‘such … charitable or benevolent object’ was disjunctive, because a gift is charitable only if every object is charitable, while not every benevolent object is charitable as defined by the law. However ‘and’ in an objects cause ‘to present classical, artistic … and educational dramatic works’ was held in Associated Artists v IRC (1956) to be disjunctive, because otherwise nothing could be presented unless it possessed all these qualities.

Confined Spaces Regulations 1997

These regulations were made under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and apply to any place (‘confined space’), including any chamber, tank, vat, silo, pit, trench, pipe, sewer, flue, well or other similar space, in which, by virtue of its enclosed nature, there arises a reasonably foreseeable specified risk, namely a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll