header-logo header-logo

15 October 2019 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7860 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Law in 101 words

9455
Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary, by Roderick Ramage

And & or

Sometimes ‘and’ and ‘or’ must be construed contrary to their normal meanings. In Chichester Diocesan v Simpson (1944) the HL decided that the ‘or’ in a testamentary disposition of residue to ‘such … charitable or benevolent object’ was disjunctive, because a gift is charitable only if every object is charitable, while not every benevolent object is charitable as defined by the law. However ‘and’ in an objects cause ‘to present classical, artistic … and educational dramatic works’ was held in Associated Artists v IRC (1956) to be disjunctive, because otherwise nothing could be presented unless it possessed all these qualities.

Confined Spaces Regulations 1997

These regulations were made under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and apply to any place (‘confined space’), including any chamber, tank, vat, silo, pit, trench, pipe, sewer, flue, well or other similar space, in which, by virtue of its enclosed nature, there arises a reasonably foreseeable specified risk, namely a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll