header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 April 2008 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The law of light

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Andrew Francis examines why the rights of light law needs changing and what form such reform should take

What do the following events have in common? The coronation of Richard I in 1189. The second and third years of the reign of William IV in 1832. The signing of the Entente Cordiale in 1904. The opening of the first section of the M1 motorway in 1959. All these dates have a bearing on rights of light. It is extraordinary to reflect that they span over 750 years. The law of light cannot be described as having modern foundations.

Why is Reform Needed?

There are two reasons why reform is overdue. First, the way in which rights of light can arise is complex and fragmented. Secondly, the state of the law can be a disincentive to development, particularly in inner city regeneration projects.

Acquisition of the right

Most features are archaic. Prescription at common law must be founded upon enjoyment since 1189. That is not a promising start.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Speechlive LogoClick to know more
Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Trio of recruits strengthens Switalskis residential property team

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Birmingham law firm appoints construction partner

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop accelerates Northern growth through strategic senior appointments

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: A wider test for unsafe homes
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience
NLJ this week: Employment deadlines lengthen

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

NLJ this week: Estoppel crosses borders
A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
NLJ this week: Safeguards under strain
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
NLJ this week: Fraud reform’s delivery test
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll