header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 April 2008 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The law of light

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Andrew Francis examines why the rights of light law needs changing and what form such reform should take

What do the following events have in common? The coronation of Richard I in 1189. The second and third years of the reign of William IV in 1832. The signing of the Entente Cordiale in 1904. The opening of the first section of the M1 motorway in 1959. All these dates have a bearing on rights of light. It is extraordinary to reflect that they span over 750 years. The law of light cannot be described as having modern foundations.

Why is Reform Needed?

There are two reasons why reform is overdue. First, the way in which rights of light can arise is complex and fragmented. Secondly, the state of the law can be a disincentive to development, particularly in inner city regeneration projects.

Acquisition of the right

Most features are archaic. Prescription at common law must be founded upon enjoyment since 1189. That is not a promising start.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll