header-logo header-logo

Law lords clarify compensation levels for commercial agents

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

News

The question of how a commercial agent should be compensated for the termination of an agency agreement under European law has been settled by the House of Lords.

In Lonsdale v Howard & Hallam Ltd the law lords rejected the French approach of automatically awarding two years’ gross commission, ruling that compensation should mirror the market value of the agency business at the date of termination.

Under the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993, a principal is required to compensate its agent if the agency agreement is terminated. However, the way compensation is calculated has until now been unclear.

Peter Ellis, partner at Browne Jacobson, says the Lonsdale case makes clear the approach to be taken in valuing compensation, but parties in this type of case may still be concerned by the cost of expert evidence to value the business.

“Often agencies are simply too small to warrant the cost of an accountancy expert. The House of Lords suggests that it should be possible for the court to have regard to the ‘going rate’ for buying and selling comparable businesses but to give greater certainty, one option might be to include a valuation clause in the agency agreement setting out the basis for the valuation on termination.”

Lord Hoffmann rejected the appellant’s request for a reference to the European Court of Justice, holding that the method for the calculation of compensation is a discretionary matter for the domestic laws of member states.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll