header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Law lords clarify compensation levels for commercial agents

News

The question of how a commercial agent should be compensated for the termination of an agency agreement under European law has been settled by the House of Lords.

In Lonsdale v Howard & Hallam Ltd the law lords rejected the French approach of automatically awarding two years’ gross commission, ruling that compensation should mirror the market value of the agency business at the date of termination.

Under the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993, a principal is required to compensate its agent if the agency agreement is terminated. However, the way compensation is calculated has until now been unclear.

Peter Ellis, partner at Browne Jacobson, says the Lonsdale case makes clear the approach to be taken in valuing compensation, but parties in this type of case may still be concerned by the cost of expert evidence to value the business.

“Often agencies are simply too small to warrant the cost of an accountancy expert. The House of Lords suggests that it should be possible for the court to have regard to the ‘going rate’ for buying and selling comparable businesses but to give greater certainty, one option might be to include a valuation clause in the agency agreement setting out the basis for the valuation on termination.”

Lord Hoffmann rejected the appellant’s request for a reference to the European Court of Justice, holding that the method for the calculation of compensation is a discretionary matter for the domestic laws of member states.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll