header-logo header-logo

01 October 2009
Issue: 7387 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Bankruptcy—Duty of Court Service to notify Chief Land Registrar—Whether duty actionable

Trustee in Bankruptcy of Louise St John Poulton v Ministry of Justice [2009] EWHC 2123 (Ch)

Chancery Division, Hazel Marshall QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, 2 September 2009.

The Insolvency Rules 1986 (IR 1986), r 6.13 impose actionable statutory duties on the chief land registrar.

James Dawson (instructed by DWF LLP) for the claimant. Jonathan Lopian (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.

A bankruptcy petition was presented in the Guildford County Court in January 2004. The court failed, however, to send notice of that petition to the chief land registrar in accordance with r 6.13 of IR 1986.

Those rules were made pursuant to powers conferred by s 412 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). Rule 6.13 provided that “when the [bankruptcy] petition is filed, the court shall forthwith send to the Chief Land Registrar notice of the petition together with a request that it may be registered in the register of pending actions.”

In March 2004, the subject

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll