header-logo header-logo

15 October 2009
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Costs—Payment of costs by non-party—Funder of litigation

Thomson v Berkhamsted Collegiate School [2009] EWHC 2374 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 39 (Oct)

Queen’s Bench Division, Blake J, 2 October 2009

The High Court has reviewed the principles relating to disclosure of material pertaining to orders for costs against third parties.

Gordon Wignall (instructed by Irwin Mitchell) for the interested parties.
Andrew Miller (instructed by Berrymans Lace Mawer) for the defendant.

The claimant brought an action against his former school in relation to damage caused to him through the alleged failure of the school to take proper measures to prevent him from being bullied.

The proceedings were issued in June 2006 and discontinued in March 2009. The school by that stage had incurred costs of approximately £250,000 in defending the action.

The claimant was unable to meet any costs order. The school contended that the action had been wholly misconceived, and sought an order for costs against third parties, pursuant to s 51 Supreme Court Act 1981 and CPR 48.2.

The interested parties, who had funded the action, were joined

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll