header-logo header-logo

Costs—Payment of costs by non-party—Funder of litigation

15 October 2009
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Thomson v Berkhamsted Collegiate School [2009] EWHC 2374 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 39 (Oct)

Queen’s Bench Division, Blake J, 2 October 2009

The High Court has reviewed the principles relating to disclosure of material pertaining to orders for costs against third parties.

Gordon Wignall (instructed by Irwin Mitchell) for the interested parties.
Andrew Miller (instructed by Berrymans Lace Mawer) for the defendant.

The claimant brought an action against his former school in relation to damage caused to him through the alleged failure of the school to take proper measures to prevent him from being bullied.

The proceedings were issued in June 2006 and discontinued in March 2009. The school by that stage had incurred costs of approximately £250,000 in defending the action.

The claimant was unable to meet any costs order. The school contended that the action had been wholly misconceived, and sought an order for costs against third parties, pursuant to s 51 Supreme Court Act 1981 and CPR 48.2.

The interested parties, who had funded the action, were joined

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll