header-logo header-logo

Costs—Payment of costs by non-party—Funder of litigation

15 October 2009
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Thomson v Berkhamsted Collegiate School [2009] EWHC 2374 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 39 (Oct)

Queen’s Bench Division, Blake J, 2 October 2009

The High Court has reviewed the principles relating to disclosure of material pertaining to orders for costs against third parties.

Gordon Wignall (instructed by Irwin Mitchell) for the interested parties.
Andrew Miller (instructed by Berrymans Lace Mawer) for the defendant.

The claimant brought an action against his former school in relation to damage caused to him through the alleged failure of the school to take proper measures to prevent him from being bullied.

The proceedings were issued in June 2006 and discontinued in March 2009. The school by that stage had incurred costs of approximately £250,000 in defending the action.

The claimant was unable to meet any costs order. The school contended that the action had been wholly misconceived, and sought an order for costs against third parties, pursuant to s 51 Supreme Court Act 1981 and CPR 48.2.

The interested parties, who had funded the action, were joined

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll