header-logo header-logo

06 November 2008
Issue: 7344 / Categories: Features , Housing
printer mail-detail

Law Reports

Housing—Homeless person—Duty of housing authority to provide accommodation

Housing—Homeless person—Duty of housing authority to provide accommodation

Boreh v London Borough of Ealing, [2008] EWCA Civ 1176, [2008] All ER (D) 291 (Oct)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lords Justices Wall, Toulson and Rimer, 29 October 2008

The suitability of accommodation offered to homeless people is not to be judged exclusively by reference to the condition of the accommodation at the time of the offer, but rather the assessment should take into account any proposed adaptations or alterations.

Christopher Jacobs (instructed by White Ryland) for the claimant. Barbara Neitler (instructed by Sylvia Ashleigh) for the authority.

The claimant became intentionally homeless. It was agreed that she was eligible for housing assistance from the defendant local authority and that she had a priority need pursuant to Pt VII of the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996). It was also agreed that the accommodation had to be suitable for her, bearing in mind that she suffered from various disabilities, was a wheelchair user and couldn’t climb stairs.

The authority offered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll