header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws—Jurisdiction—Indian-based English company

Choudhury and others v Bhatter and others [2009] EWCA Civ 510, [2009] All ER (D) 131 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward, Stanley Burnton LJJ and Sir John Chadwick, 11 November 2009

The words “regardless of domicile” in Art 22 of the Judgments Regulation have no application to a case where the person to be sued is not domiciled in a member state.

David Chivers QC (instructed by Morgan Walker Solicitors) for the appellants. Christopher Pymont QC and Jonathan Russen (instructed by Barker Gillette) for the respondents.

The proceedings concerned a company incorporated in England in 1872 for the purpose of manufacturing jute in India. It no longer had any connection with England, save that it was registered there, maintained its registered office in London and was required to make annual returns to Companies House.

Disputes arose regarding the management of the company. Declarations were sought regarding the composition of the board and the body of shareholders.

The issue arose as to whether Art 22 of Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 (the Judgments regulation)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll