header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Limitation—ATE insurance—Time when cause of action arising

Axa Insurance Ltd v Akther & Darby Solicitors and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1166, [2009] All ER (D) 151 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Arden, Longmore and Lloyd LLJ,
12 November 2009

For the purpose of an insurer’s claim in professional negligence against solicitors’ conduct in respect of an after the event (ATE) legal expenses scheme, damage beings to accrue under s 2 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) when the policies are issued; the policies are not purely contingent liabilities.

Charles Hollander QC, Tim Lord QC and Colin West (instructed by Reed Smith LLP) for the claimant. Sue Carr QC, Philip Jones QC, Ben Hubble QC, Helen Evans and Ruth Holtham (instructed by Kennedys) for the panel solicitors.

The proceedings concerned ATE insurance issued to clients of certain solicitors. The claimant was the assignee of the insurer’s rights. It contended that the solicitors were negligent in the initiation of those policies (vetting claims) and in conduct of the litigation on the client’s behalf , or the failure to notify

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll