header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Limitation—ATE insurance—Time when cause of action arising

Axa Insurance Ltd v Akther & Darby Solicitors and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1166, [2009] All ER (D) 151 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Arden, Longmore and Lloyd LLJ,
12 November 2009

For the purpose of an insurer’s claim in professional negligence against solicitors’ conduct in respect of an after the event (ATE) legal expenses scheme, damage beings to accrue under s 2 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) when the policies are issued; the policies are not purely contingent liabilities.

Charles Hollander QC, Tim Lord QC and Colin West (instructed by Reed Smith LLP) for the claimant. Sue Carr QC, Philip Jones QC, Ben Hubble QC, Helen Evans and Ruth Holtham (instructed by Kennedys) for the panel solicitors.

The proceedings concerned ATE insurance issued to clients of certain solicitors. The claimant was the assignee of the insurer’s rights. It contended that the solicitors were negligent in the initiation of those policies (vetting claims) and in conduct of the litigation on the client’s behalf , or the failure to notify

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll