header-logo header-logo

Divorce—Financial provision—Matters to be considered by court when making order

07 June 2007
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503, [2007] All ER (D) 425 (May)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division

Sir Mark Potter P, Thorpe and Wilson LJJ

24 May 2007

Determination of whether there should be any “special contribution” by one party under s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) takes place within the statutory exercise. The “sharing principle” applies to all the parties’ property but, to the extent that their property is non-matrimonial, there is likely to be better reason for departure from equality.

Barry Singleton QC, Alan Boyle QC, Deborah Eaton, Deepak Nagpal and Dakis Hagen (instructed by Withers LLP) for the husband.
Martin Pointer QC, Christopher Nugee QC, James Ewins and Andrew Mold (instructed by Manches LLP) for the wife.

The parties married in 1976. To the marriage they brought their earning capacities but at that time they had in effect no capital assets. They had two children. Considerable assets were earned by the husband during the marriage. In 2004 the wife issued a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll