header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

SHIPPING—CHARTERPARTY—SAFE PORT

AIC Ltd v Marine Pilot Ltd [2007] EWHC 1182 (Comm), [2007] All ER (D) 280(May)

Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Gloster J
17 May 2007

The phrase “1 safe port Ventspils” in an amended Asbatankvoy form is not merely a mutual agreement between the owner and charterer that the port is in fact safe, but a warranty by the charterer; moreover, a port can be rendered unsafe because of a need for lightering to get into or out of it. “Safely” means “safely as a laden ship”; there can be no distinction between loading and discharging.

Steven Berry QC and Edmund King (instructed by Holman Fenwick) for the claimant.  Timothy Young QC (instructed by Eversheds) for the defendant.

The proceedings concerned a charter substantially on the Asbatankvoy form and incorporating the charterer’s standard terms. The vessel was an Aframax oil tanker. The voyages were to load gasoil “1 safe port Ventspils” with discharge to various ports in named locations. A dispute arose concerning the sixth voyage, when the vessel arrived at Venspils to load a cargo. Due to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll