header-logo header-logo

25 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Marine insurance—Actual or constructive total loss of cargo—Piracy

Masefield AG v Amlin Corporate Member Ltd [2010] All ER (D) 210 (Feb)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, David Steel J,
18 February 2010

The seizure of a vessel by pirates does not of itself constitute an actual total loss (ATL) or a constructive total loss (CTL) for the purposes of ss 57(1) and 60(1) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 (MI 1906), although the issue is fact-sensitive.

Sir Sydney Kentridge Q.C. & Andrew Henshaw (instructed by Arbis LLP) for the claimant, Peter MacDonald Eggers & Sarah Cowey (instructed by Waltons & Morse LLP) for the defendant

In August 2008, a vessel was seized by Somali pirates in the Gulf of Aden. The claimant was the owner of two parcels of bio-diesel which had been shipped on board the vessel. The defendant was the insurer of the cargo under an open cover contract covering, inter alia, both piracy and theft. Shortly after the seizure, negotiations between the pirates and the owners began.

On 18 September, during the course of the negotiations,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll