header-logo header-logo

21 May 2010
Issue: 7418 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Immigration—Leave to enter—Family member of former refugee

ZN (Afghanistan) (FC) and others v Entry Clearance Officer (Karachi) and one other action [2010] UKSC 21, [2010] All ER (D) 88 (May)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Rodger, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke, 12 May 2010

Paras 352A and 352D of the Immigration Rules (HC 395) do not require a sponsor to be a “current” refugee when an entry clearance application is made by his or her spouse or civil partner or any of his or her children who was under the age of 18 at the time of their application.

Manjit Gill QC, Edward Nicholson and Sophie Weller (instructed by Fisher Meredith LLP) for the appellants. Lisa Giovannetti and Samantha Broadfoot (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the respondent.

The appellants were Afghan nationals. The first, ZN, married her husband (the sponsor) in 1979. ZN and the sponsor were the parents of the other appellants. The sponsor fled Afghanistan and arrived in the UK in August 1999. At some point in 1999 the family went to Pakistan.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll