header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
31 July 2008
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

SOLICITOR-COSTS-CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Conister Trust Ltd v John Hardman & Co and another [2008] EWCA Civ 841, [2008] All ER (D) 273 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division

Waller, Laws and Lawrence Collins LJJ

21 July 2008

The words “debtor” and “creditor” are terms defined by s 189(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974) and are to be used irrespective of whether the credit agreement is enforceable.

Richard Mawrey QC and Toby Riley-Smith (instructed by New Law Solicitors) for the claimant.Clive Freedman QC and William Hibbert (instructed by Kennedys) for the first defendant.Neil Hext (instructed by Herbert Smith LLP) for the second defendant.

The claimant bank designed a scheme for the funding of personal injury litigation. Under the scheme, it would enter into panel agreements with solicitors who would provide services to clients pursuant to a conditional fee agreement (CFA). The scheme covered the profit costs incurred by the solicitor in pursuit of the litigation. It did not, however, deal with the question of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll