header-logo header-logo

SOLICITOR-COSTS-CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT

31 July 2008
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Conister Trust Ltd v John Hardman & Co and another [2008] EWCA Civ 841, [2008] All ER (D) 273 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division

Waller, Laws and Lawrence Collins LJJ

21 July 2008

The words “debtor” and “creditor” are terms defined by s 189(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974) and are to be used irrespective of whether the credit agreement is enforceable.

Richard Mawrey QC and Toby Riley-Smith (instructed by New Law Solicitors) for the claimant.Clive Freedman QC and William Hibbert (instructed by Kennedys) for the first defendant.Neil Hext (instructed by Herbert Smith LLP) for the second defendant.

The claimant bank designed a scheme for the funding of personal injury litigation. Under the scheme, it would enter into panel agreements with solicitors who would provide services to clients pursuant to a conditional fee agreement (CFA). The scheme covered the profit costs incurred by the solicitor in pursuit of the litigation. It did not, however, deal with the question of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll