header-logo header-logo

SOLICITOR-COSTS-CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT

31 July 2008
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Conister Trust Ltd v John Hardman & Co and another [2008] EWCA Civ 841, [2008] All ER (D) 273 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division

Waller, Laws and Lawrence Collins LJJ

21 July 2008

The words “debtor” and “creditor” are terms defined by s 189(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974) and are to be used irrespective of whether the credit agreement is enforceable.

Richard Mawrey QC and Toby Riley-Smith (instructed by New Law Solicitors) for the claimant.Clive Freedman QC and William Hibbert (instructed by Kennedys) for the first defendant.Neil Hext (instructed by Herbert Smith LLP) for the second defendant.

The claimant bank designed a scheme for the funding of personal injury litigation. Under the scheme, it would enter into panel agreements with solicitors who would provide services to clients pursuant to a conditional fee agreement (CFA). The scheme covered the profit costs incurred by the solicitor in pursuit of the litigation. It did not, however, deal with the question of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll