header-logo header-logo

Libel and slander—Fair comment—Elements of defence

09 December 2010
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Joseph and others v Spiller and another [2010] UKSC 53, [2010] All ER (D) 16 (Dec)

Libel and slander—Fair comment—Elements of defence

Joseph and others v Spiller and another [2010] UKSC 53, [2010] All ER (D) 16 (Dec)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lord Brown and Sir John Dyson SCJJ, 1 December 2010

Lord Nicholls’s fourth proposition in Albert v Tse Wai Chun Paul (Final appeal (civil) no 12 of 2000), (2000) 10 BHRC 525 should be rewritten as “the comment must explicitly or implicitly indicate, at least in general terms, the facts on which it is based”. Moreover, the defence of fair comment should be renamed “honest comment”.

William Bennett (instructed by Howard Kennedy) for the claimants. Paul Epstein QC and David Price (instructed by David Price Solicitors & Advocates) for the defendants.

The claimants were members of a musical group known as ‘The Gillettes’ or ‘Saturday Night at the Movies’. The defendants provided entertainment booking services. The claimants appointed the defendants to promote their performances. The parties

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll