header-logo header-logo

09 December 2010
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Libel and slander—Fair comment—Elements of defence

Joseph and others v Spiller and another [2010] UKSC 53, [2010] All ER (D) 16 (Dec)

Libel and slander—Fair comment—Elements of defence

Joseph and others v Spiller and another [2010] UKSC 53, [2010] All ER (D) 16 (Dec)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lord Brown and Sir John Dyson SCJJ, 1 December 2010

Lord Nicholls’s fourth proposition in Albert v Tse Wai Chun Paul (Final appeal (civil) no 12 of 2000), (2000) 10 BHRC 525 should be rewritten as “the comment must explicitly or implicitly indicate, at least in general terms, the facts on which it is based”. Moreover, the defence of fair comment should be renamed “honest comment”.

William Bennett (instructed by Howard Kennedy) for the claimants. Paul Epstein QC and David Price (instructed by David Price Solicitors & Advocates) for the defendants.

The claimants were members of a musical group known as ‘The Gillettes’ or ‘Saturday Night at the Movies’. The defendants provided entertainment booking services. The claimants appointed the defendants to promote their performances. The parties

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll