header-logo header-logo

30 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Practice—Offer to settle—Technical error in Pt 36 offer

AF v BG [2009] EWCA Civ 757, [2009] All ER (D) 249 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lloyd and Rimer LJJ, 21 Jul 2009

A CPR Pt 36 offer may be made by a defendant in respect of a claim and potential counterclaim, even if the latter has not yet been pleaded.

The respondent (the defendant to the original proceedings) wrote a letter to the applicant (the claimant) headed “without prejudice save as to costs” and “Pt 36 offer”. It was stated that, inter alia, the applicant was obliged to reimburse the respondent for certain expenditure under a collateral agreement. It further stated that the respondent had a counterclaim against the applicant which had not at that time been pleaded. The letter stated that the respondent was “willing to accept payment of [a specified sum, smaller than that identified...as the subject of the intended counterclaim] (the sum) in full and final settlement of the whole of our client’s claim and the whole of your claim against our client in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll