News
The Law Society has escaped being fined over its complaints handling record, despite failing to meet targets set by the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner.
The commissioner, Zahida Manzoor, says she is disappointed the Legal Complaints Service (LCS) and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) failed to meet five of the 13 targets she set, particularly as most of those missed related to the quality of complaints handling. However, she decided that a financial penalty was not appropriate.
She says: “The decision was finely balanced but my conclusion was that not levying a penalty was appropriate in the circumstances to reward the effort made and to incentivise sustained improvement.”
Consumers, she says, now receive a faster and a better service in some areas from the LCS and SRA as a result of three years of hard work by her office and closely monitored improvement plans. However, more still needs to be done and she warns the LCS and SRA against future complacency.
“Sustaining improvements in all areas is something I place great importance on, and something I expect an organisation now out of its second improvement plan year to deliver,” she says.
“The consumer and the legal profession should expect the LCS and SRA to not only meet all targets but to show an ambition to excel beyond them. I know targets are not an end in themselves, but as the evidence shows, they can act as a catalyst for improvement and change.
“I am concerned that early indications show that the LCS and SRA are falling behind the agreed 2007–08 targets. The Law Society now needs to deliver on all aspects of its performance.”
Law Society chief executive Desmond Hudson says the LCS’s service compares favourably with other complaints handlers.
“We strongly supported measures in the Legal Services Act to establish a new body for dealing with all consumer complaints about lawyers that will be wholly separate from all the professional bodies,” he says.
Professor Shamit Saggar, chair of the LCS board, says: “We are very proud of the turnaround in our performance which has been driven by a board that has a clear consumer focus. We now have an excellent platform from which to deliver a modern 21st century consumer redress organisation which has the full confidence of both consumers and the profession.”
