header-logo header-logo

Law Society president criticises court fees

25 September 2015
Issue: 7669 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

It is “wrong in principle for the courts to make a profit for the government,” the Law Society has said in a firm rebuttal of government proposals to hike court fees for a second time. Law Society president John Smithers said there had been no assessment of the impact of increases of more than 600% just six months ago, which solicitors believe will stop people from bringing legitimate cases. He also reiterated Law Society concerns for higher fees for divorce claims. The government proposes to charge £550 but the Ministry of Justice estimates the actual cost to the courts to be £270.

Issue: 7669 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll