header-logo header-logo

26 August 2009 / Elizabeth Davidson
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law Society Responds to Jackson

Thousands of accident victims could be affected by the Jackson Review’s proposal to increase the small claims track limit, the Law Society has warned.

Lord Justice Jackson is due to conclude his review of civil litigation costs in December. In a preliminary report in May, he asked for views on whether the small claims track limit should be raised.

In its official response to the proposals, the Law Society warned this could result in “many thousands” of claimants losing substantial amounts of their awards in legal costs or having to represent themselves. The Society estimates there would be more than half a million more litigants in person as a result, which would be an extra burden on the courts.

Lord Jackson’s review also asked whether referral fees should be abolished, conditional fee agreements reformed, and fixed costs used more frequently.

The Law Society supported referral fees, arguing there would always be “marketing costs”. However, it said it would support further research into their effect on costs, access to justice and the behaviour of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll