header-logo header-logo

26 August 2009 / Elizabeth Davidson
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law Society Responds to Jackson

Thousands of accident victims could be affected by the Jackson Review’s proposal to increase the small claims track limit, the Law Society has warned.

Lord Justice Jackson is due to conclude his review of civil litigation costs in December. In a preliminary report in May, he asked for views on whether the small claims track limit should be raised.

In its official response to the proposals, the Law Society warned this could result in “many thousands” of claimants losing substantial amounts of their awards in legal costs or having to represent themselves. The Society estimates there would be more than half a million more litigants in person as a result, which would be an extra burden on the courts.

Lord Jackson’s review also asked whether referral fees should be abolished, conditional fee agreements reformed, and fixed costs used more frequently.

The Law Society supported referral fees, arguing there would always be “marketing costs”. However, it said it would support further research into their effect on costs, access to justice and the behaviour of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll