header-logo header-logo

Law Society support for criminal standard of proof

10 October 2018
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail

The Law Society has called for the criminal standard of proof to be kept for solicitors facing disciplinary action, placing it at loggerheads with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

The SRA wants the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal, which is consulting on the issue, to switch to the civil standard. Responding to the consultation this week, the Law Society pointed out the high prosecution success rate at the tribunal—98% in 2015-16, showing the criminal test does not stop cases being brought. Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said there was ‘an inequality of arms’ between solicitors and the ‘well-resourced’ SRA so the SRA should have to meet the highest standard of proof.

Blacklaws said the civil test was ‘too low a standard for bringing a case where conviction ends the professional career of a respondent’.

Issue: 7812 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll