header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 28 November 2008

Charges up

With property values in decline, judgment creditors will be keener than ever to seek priority over co-creditors by obtaining a charging order which can be relied on as security in the event of the judgment debtor’s bankruptcy. If that means putting off enforcement by sale until the market improves and clocking up what is becoming an increasingly handsome 8% judgment debt interest rate (where applicable) in the meantime, then “so be it”, as they might say. However, if the judgment debtor enjoys little or no equity in their property, the court is likely to refuse to make a final charging order. Other well established grounds for refusal are that the debt is too small (not defined but judgment creditors owed less than £200 could struggle before a district judge) or the application is oppressive (for example, because of delay).

The recently published Judicial and Court Statistics for last year reveal that charging order applications were up by 42% over 2006 and had increased by 722% over six years. In Yorkshire Bank Finance Ltd

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll