header-logo header-logo

LawTech flourishes after ‘golden decade’

02 December 2020
Issue: 7913 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Profession
printer mail-detail
Exciting opportunities lie ahead for UK legal services

The UK has become a global hub for LawTech, with nearly 4,500 people now employed in the sector, according to financial industry body TheCityUK’s annual legal services report.

The UK is home to 44% of all LawTech start-ups in the EU, a fact the report attributes to ‘an extensive network of 'tech labs' created by law firms, universities and other businesses. It found the industry ‘benefits from a highly developed legal market, a technology talent pipeline, a competitive tax system, a liberal regulatory regime and the recognition of the importance of innovation by government’.

Barclays, for example, has set up a hub for LawTechs in London, to encourage co-working and mentoring, while the Law Society of Scotland launched a programme in 2018 to stimulate innovation.

Government support has included the creation of the UK LawTech Delivery Panel, which announced in May that it will help develop a LawTech Sandbox, a testing hub modelled on a similar ‘sandbox’ that was used to help develop the fintech industry.

Consequently, investment in UK LawTech has tripled in the past two years, with start-ups and scale-ups now attracting £290m investment.

TheCityUK report, ‘Legal excellence, international renowned: UK legal services 2020’, published last week, also highlighted that total growth in revenue generated by legal activities in the UK rose 44% between 2010-2019 to £36.8bn last year, in a ‘golden decade’ for the legal sector.

Miles Celic, chief executive officer, TheCityUK, said: ‘As we look ahead to the next decade, there will be challenges to navigate resulting from the global Covid pandemic and our new relationship with the EU. Yet there are also many exciting opportunities for UK legal services to take forward.

‘These include continuing to build on its early leadership position in Law Tech innovation, to further enhancing diversity and inclusion across the sector, and consolidating the UK’s significant international legal services leadership.’

Issue: 7913 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll