header-logo header-logo

29 April 2016
Issue: 7697 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

LawWorks reward stars of pro bono

Students and law schools make a considerable pro bono contribution, and their efforts were celebrated at the tenth LawWorks & Attorney General Student Pro Bono Awards.

The awards, on 28 April, were presented by the Attorney-General, Jeremy Wright QC MP alongside LawWorks’ chair of trustees Paul Newdick, and head of legal at LexisNexis UK & Ireland, James Harper.

Nottingham Law School Legal Advice Centre, Nottingham Trent University won in the Best Contribution by a Law School category. The Queen Mary Legal Advice Centre won Best Contribution by a Team of Students for its SPITE Project, which advises people who have had private sexual images of themselves shared as well as campaigning on the issue. Manchester University’s Legal Advice Centre won Best New Student Pro Bono Activity for its Dementia Law Clinic. Fergus Lawrie, at the University of Strathclyde Law Clinic, won Best Contribution by an Individual Student. Lawrie, who oversees 37 student advisors, organised an exchange trip with the University of Miami Health Rights Law Clinic as well as developing with Miami an interactive way of training.

Nottingham Trent Law School’s Legal Advice Centre also scooped the inaugural Access to Justice Foundation Award which recognises the work of individuals and educational bodies in promoting and supporting access to justice, and charities which provide pro bono services.

University of Law won the Law School Challenge for raising the most funds for LawWorks and the Bar Pro Bono Unit. The London School of Economics were also recognised for their efforts as runners up.

James Harper said: “LexisNexis is incredibly proud to sponsor the LawWorks and Attorney General Student Pro Bono Awards. We are committed to supporting access to justice which we believe is a fundamental human right. We congratulate all those nominated and shortlisted for their valuable contributions and we are honoured to support the innovative and vital pro bono work being delivered across the country.”

Between April 2014 and March 2015, more than 2,000 students handled more than 11,000 queries at the 70 LawWorks clinics in law schools.

Issue: 7697 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll