header-logo header-logo

Lawyer welcomes rejection of PII “bombshell”

10 December 2014
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Frank Maher, partner at Legal Risk, has welcomed the Legal Services Board (LSB) decision to reject plans to reduce the minimum level of professional indemnity insurance (PII) cover to £500,000.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) had proposed lowering the minimum cover from £2m for firms, and £3m for incorporated firms and LLPs, to £500,000 to create more flexibility in the market. However, the LSB said in November that it was “not persuaded by the evidence put forward”. 

Maher says: “There was no credible evidence that there would be any real saving and the costs of buying back cover would have been substantially more.”

He added that he was surprised to find that “nobody at the SRA or LSB seemed to have realised the bombshell revelation that the £500,000 would include claimants’ costs”.

“There was no mention of it in the SRA’s discussions. In practice it would mean that the protection given would only have amounted to about £250,000 or £300,000 if the case was contested. It is frightening that they did not appreciate this.”

Maher concludes: “It takes us back to where we were, which is that we need a full review of professional indemnity insurance. No insurance covers everything so we need to look at what is reasonable.”

 

Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll