header-logo header-logo

Lawyers’ regulators fail report card

02 April 2025
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Legal services
printer mail-detail
Both the Bar and solicitors’ regulators have failed to meet required standards in their annual Legal Services Board (LSB) performance assessment.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) was criticised for not publishing pass-rate data for the Solicitors Qualifying Examination, leaving aspiring solicitors in the dark about which training provider to choose. The LSB gave it until the autumn to produce this information. The LSB also criticised failures in its supervision of high-risk firms and protection of client funds—revealed after the closure of law firm Axiom Ince in 2023 with about £66m client money missing.

A spokesperson for the SRA said: ‘We will be discussing with our Board and agreeing an action plan.’

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) came in for criticism for being too slow to improve, despite restructuring in December 2024 as part of a ‘reform programme’ agreed with the LSB.

It also takes too long to investigate misconduct complaints against barristers, with only 67% of investigations—the benchmark is 80%—decided within 38 weeks. The LSB found that, while the quality of decisions was high, ‘the significant delays in reaching these decisions is of serious concern, not least because this is an issue that has been present for some years now’. Moreover, the LSB has asked the BSB to explain why it reduced its targets in September 2024 from 80% of investigations completed within 25 weeks to 80% within 38 weeks.

A BSB spokesperson said: ‘We have been in continual dialogue and have provided detailed evidence to respond to the challenges and the concerns the LSB have raised about the pace of change.’ The BSB is due to consult in the summer on changes to its enforcement regulations.

Craig Westwood, the LSB’s chief executive, said there were ‘some concerning shortfalls in regulatory performance, particularly from the two largest regulators’. 

Law Society chief executive Ian Jeffery said: ‘While the events leading to the collapse of Axiom Ince were happening, the SRA was focused on increasing its fining powers and proposing regulatory expansion. Instead, it should have been tackling the known risks from accumulator-style firms and ensuring its operations were joined up and laser focused on protecting consumers.’

Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
back-to-top-scroll