header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Lawyers dismiss PDS as daylight robbery

News

Defence lawyers have dismissed Legal Services Commission (LSC) claims that the Public Defender Service (PDS) provides a better quality of service than private practice.

The LSC claims are made on the back of independent research, published this week, based on analysis of the PDS during its first three years of operation. The PDS was set up in 2001 as the first salaried criminal defence service provider in England and Wales.

The study shows that during the start-up period, when the PDS was building up its caseload, it had higher costs than other criminal defence providers in the same areas.

Its conclusions state that: “[T]he case that the PDS can provide general criminal defence services at a comparable cost to contract providers remains unproven.

Even using our ‘low’ estimate of PDS costs, based on their running costs only and excluding capital and start-up costs, there was a very significant cost differential between the average case costs of the PDS during its first three years of operation and comparable private practice, ranging from between 40% to just over 90% higher for the PDS depending on the area and type of case.”

Legal Aid Practitioners Group director Richard Miller says: “The evidence shows that the Birmingham and Liverpool PDS offices performed worse in quality terms than the average of all private practice firms in their region, while the other offices performed only a little better than average.

“These offices had substantially lower caseloads than
private practice firms. They also received substantially more public money per case. The PDS cost around half as much again as private practice, and on some measures more than twice as much. Yet they were still unable to keep up with the best private practice firms on quality.

Andrew Keogh of Tuckers Solicitors says: “The PDS costs
between 41% and 93% more than private practice. “For that act of daylight robbery you get more staff doing fewer hours on less serious cases, yet the legal aid minister claims that the PDS has a future. It beggars belief.”
Defending the service, Gaynor Ogden, head of employed services at the LSC says: “The research report is based on data collected early in the life of the PDS and we have come a long way since then in terms of growth, quality and cost.”

Copies of the 354-page report can be downloaded at www.legalservices.gov.uk/criminal/pds/evaluation.asp.

Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll