header-logo header-logo

12 May 2021
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Judicial review , Immigration & asylum , Planning
printer mail-detail

Lawyers give cool reception to Queen's Speech

Lawyers brace for judicial review battle after reforms proposed

Lawyers have given an unenthusiastic response to the Queen’s Speech programme of 30 bills for the next Parliamentary term.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill would be meaningless without investment in the criminal justice system. She called for legal aid to be restored for early advice in housing, family and other areas.

However, it was the proposal to bring forward judicial review reform that caused most concern. Boyce said this risked ‘taking power away from citizens and putting more into the hands of government.

‘The independent panel convened by government to review the relationship between the courts and the state found no evidence of judicial overreach. Judicial review is an essential check on power’.

Chair of the Bar Council, Derek Sweeting QC agreed: ‘The judicial review process is central to access to justice for the public. We are concerned that some of the proposed reforms are far-reaching with insufficient time allowed for consultation or scrutiny.’

Both the Bar Council and the Law Society have expressed concerns about the Home Office’s ‘confused’ New Plan for Immigration consultation, which would be brought forward in a sovereign borders bill.

Another bill promised to ease planning controls and increase housebuilding in England.

Marnix Elsenaar, head of planning at Addleshaw Goddard, said: ‘The government has promised a Planning Bill to "modernise the planning system, so that more homes can be built". That's all we got. 

‘The Bill is likely to require local authorities to allocate land either for growth, so that new homes, schools, offices and shops will get a fast-track to planning approval, or for protection. Rumour has it that a third "regeneration" zone is being considered. What we can say with certainty is that the Bill will be a big step on the road away from the development control system that we're used to, towards a US-style zonal system that front-loads community engagement to the plan-making stage and provides a national and local design code that sets the parameters for what you can build.’

Other bills included a skills and post-16 education bill for England, and new laws to scrap the Fixed-term Parliaments Act.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll