header-logo header-logo

Lawyers hope for permanent legal aid delay

08 December 2011
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Controversial reforms to civil & family law delayed until spring 2013

Lawyers have called for the delay in the legal aid reforms to be made permanent.

Justice Secretary Ken Clarke announced last week that the reforms to civil and family law legal aid are to be pushed back six months from next October to April 2013. The proposed reforms in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill remove legal aid from several areas of law, including clinical negligence, private family work, debt, benefits, housing and employment.

However, the parts of the Bill relating to Lord Justice Jackson’s civil costs reforms remain on schedule.

A Ministry of Justice (MoJ) spokesperson said: “As things stand, there are no changes to the timetable for implementation of civil costs reform.”

David Greene, a partner at Edwin Coe, says: “We can only hope that the barrage of criticism of these cuts to legal aid at the Lords stage of the Bill has had some permanent effect.

“If the government actually proposes to abandon the cuts, Ken Clarke should have the gumption to say so, rather than leaving many in a state of unknown. If the delay hides a climbdown, this is good news for access to justice for a significant section of society.”

According to the MoJ, the legal aid reforms have been delayed in order to give 12 months for a full contract tender process to take place once Parliament has confirmed the precise content of the Bill, which is unlikely to receive Royal Assent earlier than March 2012.

An MoJ spokesperson said: “New contracts to provide civil and family advice will be offered to lawyers in April 2013, which will give them sufficient time to consider the final details of the new legal aid scheme, which Parliament is expected to agree in spring 2012.”

Legal groups vowed to continue their campaign against the Bill, which moves to committee stage in the House of Lords on 20 December.

Issue: 7493 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll