header-logo header-logo

Lawyers hope for permanent legal aid delay

08 December 2011
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Controversial reforms to civil & family law delayed until spring 2013

Lawyers have called for the delay in the legal aid reforms to be made permanent.

Justice Secretary Ken Clarke announced last week that the reforms to civil and family law legal aid are to be pushed back six months from next October to April 2013. The proposed reforms in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill remove legal aid from several areas of law, including clinical negligence, private family work, debt, benefits, housing and employment.

However, the parts of the Bill relating to Lord Justice Jackson’s civil costs reforms remain on schedule.

A Ministry of Justice (MoJ) spokesperson said: “As things stand, there are no changes to the timetable for implementation of civil costs reform.”

David Greene, a partner at Edwin Coe, says: “We can only hope that the barrage of criticism of these cuts to legal aid at the Lords stage of the Bill has had some permanent effect.

“If the government actually proposes to abandon the cuts, Ken Clarke should have the gumption to say so, rather than leaving many in a state of unknown. If the delay hides a climbdown, this is good news for access to justice for a significant section of society.”

According to the MoJ, the legal aid reforms have been delayed in order to give 12 months for a full contract tender process to take place once Parliament has confirmed the precise content of the Bill, which is unlikely to receive Royal Assent earlier than March 2012.

An MoJ spokesperson said: “New contracts to provide civil and family advice will be offered to lawyers in April 2013, which will give them sufficient time to consider the final details of the new legal aid scheme, which Parliament is expected to agree in spring 2012.”

Legal groups vowed to continue their campaign against the Bill, which moves to committee stage in the House of Lords on 20 December.

Issue: 7493 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll