header-logo header-logo

Lawyers love AI, LexisNexis research shows

01 September 2025
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence , Technology , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail
Six out of ten lawyers now use artificial intelligence (AI) in their day-to-day work (up from 46% in January), according to a LexisNexis UK report, ‘The AI culture clash’

The numbers are likely to keep growing—the report, published this week, found 94% of firms plan to adopt AI (up from 85%) while two-thirds of lawyers want to use AI more.

Those who use it report the benefits of freeing up time both for more billable work and a better work-life balance. In fact, two-thirds of lawyers complained their organisation was too slow to implement AI.

Among those already using AI, more than half (51%) have chosen tools designed specifically for the legal sector—such as Lexis+ AI.

Stuart Greenhill, senior director of segment management at LexisNexis UK, said: ‘Lawyers are proving that AI delivers clear commercial returns.

‘They’re using it to increase billable hours, rethink pricing models, and deliver more value to clients.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll