header-logo header-logo

Lawyers mourn the death of Queen Elizabeth II

09 September 2022
Issue: 7994 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
The legal profession has paid tribute to Queen Elizabeth II, who has died at the age of 96 after a reign of 70 years

As the second Elizabethan era ended on Thursday 8 September 2022 and the reign of King Charles III began, lawyers reflected on the Queen’s long years of service.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘On this sad occasion we share in the grief of the nation at the passing of Queen Elizabeth II.

‘On behalf of the solicitor profession, I would also like to offer our condolences to the Royal Family. As the holder of a Royal Charter, the Society has been very grateful to the Queen for her role in public life, as a defender of the constitution and source of stability in an era of great change.

‘As our longest serving monarch we’re thankful for the way she dedicated her life to the service of this country.’ 

Mark Fenhalls KC, Bar Council chair, said: ‘The Officers, members and staff of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales join with colleagues across the legal professions in mourning the loss of our country’s most devoted public servant.

‘Throughout a long, loyal, and steadfast reign, Queen Elizabeth II embodied the symbolic role of the figure in whose name justice is carried out with great integrity. I have written to offer our deep and sincere condolences to His Majesty The King. Our thoughts are with the Royal Family at this time.’

The Bar Council stated that it had been advised by the Crown Office that the title Queen’s Counsel (QC) changes to King’s Counsel (KC) with immediate effect—one of many administrative changes that will need to be made. The change is automatic so there are no new Letters Patent.

CILEX Chair, Chris Bones said: ‘We are deeply saddened on the news of the death of Her Majesty the Queen. On the behalf of CILEX, we send our deepest sympathies to the Royal Family.’

On behalf of the judiciary, Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, said: ‘Her Majesty’s service to this country and the Commonwealth throughout the seven decades of her reign has been unparalleled.

‘I am sure many of you will want to pay your respects over the coming days.’

Lord Burnett said guidance will follow on any changes to court and tribunal business during the period of national mourning.

Issue: 7994 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll