header-logo header-logo

Lawyers on film

22 November 2024 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8095 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
197676
Mark Pawlowski provides a run-down of films featuring thorny legal issues.

Through cinema, the film maker can tackle a range of legal themes and processes, as well as ethical and moral issues within our society.

Two films, in particular, highlight the complexities of civil litigation. In The Verdict (1982), Paul Newman plays the part of a hack lawyer representing a young woman who is permanently comatose because a doctor gave her the wrong anaesthesia. The film takes an interesting look at civil procedure and the US legal profession. Newman informs the woman’s family that he works on a contingency fee basis and hopes to settle the case for a reasonable sum. The defence is also keen to ‘buy the case’ since this will avoid unnecessary publicity. Even the trial judge presses the parties to settle out of court.

Eventually, however, Newman rejects an offer of settlement (without even informing his clients) and opts for a trial and a fight for the truth. The film tackles a number of different aspects of civil procedure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll