header-logo header-logo

27 September 2022
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Conveyancing , Employment
printer mail-detail

Lawyers respond to mini-budget

Conveyancers brace for heavy workload following stamp duty cut

The stamp duty land tax threshold has been raised with immediate effect and the 45% income tax rate (paid by those earning more than £150,000 per year) is to be abolished next year.

Basic income tax will be reduced by one pence to 19p per pound next year.  Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng also abolished caps on bankers’ bonuses, announced plans for more City deregulation, axed the proposed increase in corporation tax from 19% to 25%, and has confirmed the National Insurance increase to pay for the NHS and social care will be halted in November.

While the pound plunged to below $1.09 in response to the mini-budget—its lowest since 1985—Kwarteng said the measures would boost economic growth by attracting investment.

Stamp duty thresholds on residential properties will rise from £125,000 to £250,000, and £300,000 to £450,000 for first-time buyers. The ceiling for first-time buyers’ relief has been raised from £500,000 to £625,000.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said ‘conveyancing solicitors will now be watching and waiting to see how the changes announced will impact their workload and businesses’.

Winckworth Sherwood partner Blair Adams said the measures ‘may relieve some of the pressure on businesses caused by rising costs in the supply chain and increased energy costs’ and ‘may also take some of the urgency out of employee demands for large pay increases’.

‘One specific employment law measure that has been announced today is the proposal to scrap the off-payroll working rules from April 2023, for both the public and private sectors. This will mean that end-user clients engaging individuals via intermediaries will no longer be responsible for determining the tax status of the arrangement and, potentially, for payments of tax. 

‘Instead, the liability will fall back on the intermediary. Having spoken to end-user clients about this already, this is seen as a positive step.’

Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Conveyancing , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll