header-logo header-logo

Lawyers respond to mini-budget

27 September 2022
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Conveyancing , Employment
printer mail-detail
Conveyancers brace for heavy workload following stamp duty cut

The stamp duty land tax threshold has been raised with immediate effect and the 45% income tax rate (paid by those earning more than £150,000 per year) is to be abolished next year.

Basic income tax will be reduced by one pence to 19p per pound next year.  Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng also abolished caps on bankers’ bonuses, announced plans for more City deregulation, axed the proposed increase in corporation tax from 19% to 25%, and has confirmed the National Insurance increase to pay for the NHS and social care will be halted in November.

While the pound plunged to below $1.09 in response to the mini-budget—its lowest since 1985—Kwarteng said the measures would boost economic growth by attracting investment.

Stamp duty thresholds on residential properties will rise from £125,000 to £250,000, and £300,000 to £450,000 for first-time buyers. The ceiling for first-time buyers’ relief has been raised from £500,000 to £625,000.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said ‘conveyancing solicitors will now be watching and waiting to see how the changes announced will impact their workload and businesses’.

Winckworth Sherwood partner Blair Adams said the measures ‘may relieve some of the pressure on businesses caused by rising costs in the supply chain and increased energy costs’ and ‘may also take some of the urgency out of employee demands for large pay increases’.

‘One specific employment law measure that has been announced today is the proposal to scrap the off-payroll working rules from April 2023, for both the public and private sectors. This will mean that end-user clients engaging individuals via intermediaries will no longer be responsible for determining the tax status of the arrangement and, potentially, for payments of tax. 

‘Instead, the liability will fall back on the intermediary. Having spoken to end-user clients about this already, this is seen as a positive step.’

Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Conveyancing , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll