header-logo header-logo

Lawyers at SGM demand legal aid rethink

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

News

The government’s controversial plans for legal aid were unanimously rejected by around 400 solicitors at a specially convened Law Society Special General Meeting (SGM) in Chancery Lane last week.
The mostly legal aid practitioners gave their overwhelming support to a motion tabled last year by Roger Peach, a solicitor at Southampton law firm Peach Grey & Co.

The motion calls for solicitors to knock back the government’s plans to introduce competitive tendering between firms and the awarding of fixed-length contracts for legal aid work. It also urges the Law Society to renegotiate terms for criminal defence contracts.

Andrew Holroyd, Law Society vice president, says: “The SGM highlights the strength of feeling among solicitors about the current legal aid reforms. The Law Society wants the same result as all the solicitors who attended the meeting—to secure a sustainable future for legal aid and to protect vulnerable clients. We continue to lobby intensively to secure a viable future for legal aid.”

Holroyd and Law Society chief executive Des Hudson, giving evidence on the reforms to the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee last week, said the proposals threaten access to justice by damaging the  legal aid supplier base.

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll