header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Lawyers at SGM demand legal aid rethink

News

The government’s controversial plans for legal aid were unanimously rejected by around 400 solicitors at a specially convened Law Society Special General Meeting (SGM) in Chancery Lane last week.
The mostly legal aid practitioners gave their overwhelming support to a motion tabled last year by Roger Peach, a solicitor at Southampton law firm Peach Grey & Co.

The motion calls for solicitors to knock back the government’s plans to introduce competitive tendering between firms and the awarding of fixed-length contracts for legal aid work. It also urges the Law Society to renegotiate terms for criminal defence contracts.

Andrew Holroyd, Law Society vice president, says: “The SGM highlights the strength of feeling among solicitors about the current legal aid reforms. The Law Society wants the same result as all the solicitors who attended the meeting—to secure a sustainable future for legal aid and to protect vulnerable clients. We continue to lobby intensively to secure a viable future for legal aid.”

Holroyd and Law Society chief executive Des Hudson, giving evidence on the reforms to the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee last week, said the proposals threaten access to justice by damaging the  legal aid supplier base.

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll