header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Lawyers at SGM demand legal aid rethink

News

The government’s controversial plans for legal aid were unanimously rejected by around 400 solicitors at a specially convened Law Society Special General Meeting (SGM) in Chancery Lane last week.
The mostly legal aid practitioners gave their overwhelming support to a motion tabled last year by Roger Peach, a solicitor at Southampton law firm Peach Grey & Co.

The motion calls for solicitors to knock back the government’s plans to introduce competitive tendering between firms and the awarding of fixed-length contracts for legal aid work. It also urges the Law Society to renegotiate terms for criminal defence contracts.

Andrew Holroyd, Law Society vice president, says: “The SGM highlights the strength of feeling among solicitors about the current legal aid reforms. The Law Society wants the same result as all the solicitors who attended the meeting—to secure a sustainable future for legal aid and to protect vulnerable clients. We continue to lobby intensively to secure a viable future for legal aid.”

Holroyd and Law Society chief executive Des Hudson, giving evidence on the reforms to the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee last week, said the proposals threaten access to justice by damaging the  legal aid supplier base.

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll