header-logo header-logo

Lawyers & the threat of social media

19 November 2015
Issue: 7678 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Some 85% of US and UK corporate counsel at Fortune 1000 companies fear social media could push a minor problem into a major crisis.

However, these concerns do not necessarily translate into action.

The lawyers believe social media poses a risk to what 91% of them described as their company’s greatest asset, its reputation, but do not believe there is a legal risk and tend not to become heavily involved in planning for mitigation and response.

That’s according to a report by media managers Weber Shandwick and KRC Research, Social Media’s Role in Crisis Management: A Call for Greater Legal Vigilance. It is based on a survey of 100 senior and mid-level corporate counsel (50 in the US and 50 in the UK) who advise on risk, reputation and brand protection.

“Our research suggests that in-house lawyers are underestimating an important area of risk,” says Rod Clayton, co-head of global crisis and issues at Weber Shandwick.

“Social media has its own set of challenges, and legal counsel should ask themselves if they’re ready to address what can be powerful threats to reputation.”

Only one in five counsel have experienced a social media crisis, and those who have reported that the outcome was a decline in employee morale and retention rather than a specific legal issue. Only half the lawyers had undergone training on the impact social media has on their company. Only one in five counsel said the legal department was “very” involved in social media crisis planning, and counsel spent an average of 2.4% of their own time on the topic. Less than half said their company would be “excellent” or “very good” at responding to a social media problem.

The report offers guidelines for in-house counsel to more effectively engage in social media crisis preparation and response in order to safeguard corporate reputations from digital attacks.

Issue: 7678 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll