header-logo header-logo

Lawyers want firms to move faster on legal tech

20 February 2025
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Artificial intelligence , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail
Impatience is growing among lawyers as firms drag their feet on tech investment, a report by LexisNexis Legal & Professional has found.

Nearly half (47%) of private practice lawyers surveyed say their firm is slow or very slow at adopting new technology, according to the report, 'Innovating the client experience', published this week. Only 18% say their firm is fast or very fast.

Some 58% say their firm is behind on using data and analytics.

More than one third—35%—admit their firm is too slow at delivering legal work in general.

Meanwhile, 57% expect artificial intelligence (AI) to transform legal research and document review within three years—but will their firms keep up?

As Laura Hodgson, the AI Lead at Linklaters, says in the report: ‘There needs to be a mind shift to recognise that law firms have more to offer than the knowledge in each lawyer’s head: institutional data and new workflows can transform the value provided to clients.’

Sluggish systems are another bugbear: for example, more than half (52%) of private practice lawyers rated their firm as adequate, slow or very slow at conducting legal research. Some 45% said the same when asked about drafting and reviewing legal documents.

These private practice frustrations are reflected by the wish list of corporate counsel.

The survey, of more than 800 legal professionals, asked in-house legal counsel what they need from their external lawyers. Nearly three-quarters (74%) said they need their external team to be cost-effective, 67% need them to be responsive and agile, and 44% need them to offer specialist legal expertise—all of which require an investment in new technology and innovation.

Stuart Greenhill, senior director of segments at LexisNexis UK, said: ‘To remain competitive, firms will need to deliver a superior, data-driven legal service, at the same cost or lower, and at pace—and to keep clients informed of any legal or regulatory developments.

‘Achieving all this without the help of modern technology will be difficult. To secure client relationships, firms will need to invest in a streamlined, data-driven client offering.’

A potential loss of talent is another downside for firms that lag behind on tech. One quarter of all lawyers responding said it would negatively impact their careers if their firm failed to embrace AI, and 11% would consider leaving. At larger firms, these figures were higher—36% and 19%, respectively.

View the full report here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll