header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
10 May 2024 / Sophia Purkis
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Lawyers & witnesses: immunity from suit

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
171868
A recent case highlights the importance of immunity from suit, writes Sophia Purkis
  • Lawyers’ and witnesses’ immunity from suit from opposing parties is fundamental to our justice system.
  • Pleading fraud won’t circumvent the principle.
  • However, lawyers and witnesses may still face criminal and/or regulatory sanction if they lie to or mislead the court.

A judgment may be set aside if it were procured by fraud. However, if it is alleged that counsel and solicitors for the allegedly fraudulent party were involved in that fraud, does this prevent the lawyers from being able to rely upon the principle of immunity from suit? No, said Mr Justice Fancourt in El Haddad v Al Rostamani and others [2024] EWHC 448 (Ch), [2024] All ER (D) 43 (Mar).

El Haddad explained

The origins of immunity from suit lie in the attempt to prevent disgruntled defendants in criminal proceedings from bringing defamation claims against those who gave evidence against them. It was extended to all who took part in legal proceedings, including

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll