header-logo header-logo

25 May 2018 / Janet Paraskeva
Issue: 7794 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Laying the foundations

nlj_7794_paraskeva

Janet Paraskeva discusses the CLC’s strategy to become the regulator of choice for property lawyers

  • Licensed conveyancers, and indeed a growing number of solicitors, see a real benefit in having regulation tailored to their own areas of practice.

With the government pressing ahead with plans to improve the home-buying process, it is a busy time to be regulating conveyancers.

There is, of course, no shortage of regulators in the legal market. There are now ten overseen by the Legal Services Board, and the largest ones—such as the Solicitors Regulation Authority—regulate lawyers undertaking the full range of legal work.

The Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) has previously explored widening the scope of its regulation to encompass activities other than conveyancing and probate, which is what we regulate at the moment. But in discussing our strategy for the next four years, we concluded that there were enough generalist regulators already—we decided we would be better off focusing on our existing strengths and becoming the regulator of choice for property lawyers.

Most importantly, this was what conveyancers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll