header-logo header-logo

Leading AI product launches in the UK

13 June 2024
Issue: 8075 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail

Lexis+ AI, the artificial intelligence tool based on reliable legal content and designed specifically for lawyers, is now generally available for customers in the UK

The announcement, made this week by LexisNexis Legal & Professional, follows the commercial launches of the product in the US and Australia.

Lexis+ AI provides direct links in its responses to citable authority from LexisNexis, the world’s largest repository of legal content.

This means users can instantly validate results, safeguarding against the risk of invented content or hallucinations. Cases of ChatGPT hallucinating or inventing fictitious cases have been reported in both the US and Canada after lawyers used the generic AI tool for legal research. 

However, Lexis+ AI automatically checks all linked citations against LexisNexis’ content to ensure they are valid. The LexisNexis repository contains primary, secondary, analytical content and practical guidance modules.

Gerry Duffy, managing director of LexisNexis UK, said: ‘This is a pivotal moment in the history of the UK legal industry.

‘We have had unprecedented levels of interest in Lexis+ AI from our market and as of today, many of our customers will be enjoying the competitive advantage of having access to our rich and authoritative content combined with our leading AI technology.’

The product was developed with input from law firms including Macfarlanes, Eversheds Sutherland, Pinsent Masons and CMS UK.

Eleanor Windsor, partner and director of knowledge management at Irwin Mitchell, which has selected Lexis+ AI, said it would enable lawyers to ask questions as they would to a trusted colleague, with cited and linked answers.

LexisNexis describes Lexis+ AI’s features as including ‘conversational search, intelligent legal drafting, insightful summarisation, and document upload capabilities, all supported by state-of-the-art encryption and privacy technology to keep sensitive data secure’.

For more information on Lexis+ AI or for a demo, visit Lexisnexis.co.uk/lexis-plus/lexis-plus-ai.html

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll