header-logo header-logo

Leading the legal aid way

03 October 2025 / David Burrows
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail
231394
As one of the greats of legal aid retires, David Burrows offers his thoughts on legal aid today & over the past 50 years

Last month, Patrick Allen from Hodge Jones & Allen (HJA) stepped down from the firm he founded in 1977 with Henry Hodge and Peter Jones. About ten years ago, I met Patrick briefly at a lunch hosted by the editor of this journal, though I knew Henry Hodge in the late 80s.

The slightly fuzzy photo (above) of the smiling HJA trio speaks to a variety of thoughts for me of practice in the 1970s and of our optimism as lawyers then. So much seemed possible for many of us, with leadership from such firms as HJA and their tireless support of the legal aid scheme. They paved the way for many of us. Patrick’s retirement is truly the end of an era which began in the 1970s—much kinder times.

I happen to be two weeks older than the original legal aid scheme. The Legal Aid and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll