header-logo header-logo

03 October 2025 / David Burrows
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Leading the legal aid way

231394
As one of the greats of legal aid retires, David Burrows offers his thoughts on legal aid today & over the past 50 years

Last month, Patrick Allen from Hodge Jones & Allen (HJA) stepped down from the firm he founded in 1977 with Henry Hodge and Peter Jones. About ten years ago, I met Patrick briefly at a lunch hosted by the editor of this journal, though I knew Henry Hodge in the late 80s.

The slightly fuzzy photo (above) of the smiling HJA trio speaks to a variety of thoughts for me of practice in the 1970s and of our optimism as lawyers then. So much seemed possible for many of us, with leadership from such firms as HJA and their tireless support of the legal aid scheme. They paved the way for many of us. Patrick’s retirement is truly the end of an era which began in the 1970s—much kinder times.

I happen to be two weeks older than the original legal aid scheme. The Legal Aid and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll