header-logo header-logo

Learning curve

22 July 2016 / Stephen Honey
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7708_honey

Solicitors are strongly committed to continuing training, says Stephen Honey

Almost three-quarters of solicitors expect to undertake 16 or more hours of training in the next CPD year, despite the removal of the mandatory target across the profession from November, according to a recent LexisNexis survey.

Wide-ranging survey

The online survey, which closed on 4 July, drew responses from a broad cross section of practitioners, from newly qualifieds through to those with more than 15 years’ experience, working in a wide range of firms, from sole practices to firms with over 100 partners as well as the employed sector. Respondents were divided equally according to whether or not their firm had a dedicated learning and development function.

Just under half of those surveyed felt that the increased flexibility and freedom offered by “continuing competence”, which replaces the previous “continuing professional development” scheme, will have a positive impact on training, with a further 40% anticipating that it will not have any significant impact. Only 11% believed that it would have a negative impact as their firms

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll