header-logo header-logo

20 June 2025 / Mark Chick
Issue: 8121 / Categories: Features , Profession , Leasehold , Property , Housing , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Leasehold isn’t broken (so why fix it?)

223025
Mark Chick ponders the leasehold v commonhold conundrum, arguing for reform, not replacement
  • Government plans to ban new leasehold flats may not be taking into account challenges that exist with regard to the commonhold system.
  • This article questions the need for a ban, arguing that reform to leasehold could benefit leaseholders and freeholders.

The government is planning to replace leasehold with commonhold, and to take steps to make commonhold the default tenure for new flats within the lifetime of this Parliament. As the first stage in this process, it published its Commonhold White Paper in March. In the white paper, the government said it would consult on the ‘best approach to banning new leasehold flats’.

While I support the proposals to reform the current system, I am also mindful of the challenges that must be overcome to make commonhold succeed for all types of development, and of the fact that leasehold is not the complete failure that some have stated.

There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll