header-logo header-logo

20 June 2025 / Mark Chick
Issue: 8121 / Categories: Features , Profession , Leasehold , Property , Housing , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Leasehold isn’t broken (so why fix it?)

223025
Mark Chick ponders the leasehold v commonhold conundrum, arguing for reform, not replacement
  • Government plans to ban new leasehold flats may not be taking into account challenges that exist with regard to the commonhold system.
  • This article questions the need for a ban, arguing that reform to leasehold could benefit leaseholders and freeholders.

The government is planning to replace leasehold with commonhold, and to take steps to make commonhold the default tenure for new flats within the lifetime of this Parliament. As the first stage in this process, it published its Commonhold White Paper in March. In the white paper, the government said it would consult on the ‘best approach to banning new leasehold flats’.

While I support the proposals to reform the current system, I am also mindful of the challenges that must be overcome to make commonhold succeed for all types of development, and of the fact that leasehold is not the complete failure that some have stated.

There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll