header-logo header-logo

09 January 2020
Issue: 7869 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

Leasehold purchase reforms

The Law Commission has launched its proposals for reform of leasehold, which it claims could potentially save homeowners millions of pounds

Its report, Reforming valuation in leasehold enfranchisement, published this week, follows a consultation with leaseholders, landlords and investors. It sets out three options to make it cheaper for homeowners to buy their freehold or extend their lease―a process known as enfranchisement. Each option uses a different method to calculate the value of the leasehold and therefore the premium the occupant should pay.

The elements of an enfranchisement premium are the term (value of ground rent over the remaining years of the lease), the reversion (value for the landlord of getting the property back at the end of the lease), the marriage value (extra value gained when landlord’s and leaseholder’s interests are joined) and the hope value (a slice of the marriage value).

The three options for calculating the premium are: term and reversion (marriage value is ignored); term, reversion and hope value; and term, reversion and marriage value.

The Commission also suggests a range of other reforms, including: prescribing the rates used in calculating the price, to eliminate a potential source of argument; helping leaseholders with onerous ground rents by capping the level used to calculate the price; creating an online calculator; and enabling groups of leaseholders collectively enfranchising a block of flats to avoid paying development value unless development has been undertaken.

Professor Nicholas Hopkins, Property Law Commissioner, said: ‘We were asked to provide options for reform that save leaseholders money when buying their freehold or extending their lease, while ensuring that sufficient compensation is paid to landlords. This is what we’ve done.’

Issue: 7869 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll