header-logo header-logo

09 January 2020
Issue: 7869 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

Leasehold purchase reforms

The Law Commission has launched its proposals for reform of leasehold, which it claims could potentially save homeowners millions of pounds

Its report, Reforming valuation in leasehold enfranchisement, published this week, follows a consultation with leaseholders, landlords and investors. It sets out three options to make it cheaper for homeowners to buy their freehold or extend their lease―a process known as enfranchisement. Each option uses a different method to calculate the value of the leasehold and therefore the premium the occupant should pay.

The elements of an enfranchisement premium are the term (value of ground rent over the remaining years of the lease), the reversion (value for the landlord of getting the property back at the end of the lease), the marriage value (extra value gained when landlord’s and leaseholder’s interests are joined) and the hope value (a slice of the marriage value).

The three options for calculating the premium are: term and reversion (marriage value is ignored); term, reversion and hope value; and term, reversion and marriage value.

The Commission also suggests a range of other reforms, including: prescribing the rates used in calculating the price, to eliminate a potential source of argument; helping leaseholders with onerous ground rents by capping the level used to calculate the price; creating an online calculator; and enabling groups of leaseholders collectively enfranchising a block of flats to avoid paying development value unless development has been undertaken.

Professor Nicholas Hopkins, Property Law Commissioner, said: ‘We were asked to provide options for reform that save leaseholders money when buying their freehold or extending their lease, while ensuring that sufficient compensation is paid to landlords. This is what we’ve done.’

Issue: 7869 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll