header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 March 2024 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 8062 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

IPP & joint enterprise: left to languish?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Jon Robins on why we need more politicians willing to support unfashionable causes

How speedily ministers can act when the world watches on and an election looms. At the time of going to print, parliamentary draftsmen are bashing out unprecedented legislation for the mass exoneration of hundreds of subpostmasters. They have been shamed out of years of inaction by ITV’s brilliant drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office, broadcast early this year.

But how long does it take for politicians to address an injustice in normal circumstances—that is, in the face of political indifference, media disengagement and public complacency? There are thousands of people in prison who insist they shouldn’t be there. They are in prison as a result of two controversial (and very different) features of our justice system, both long identified as scandals: imprisonment for public protection (IPP) and joint enterprise.

The fight for reform is powered by two extraordinary campaigns by prisoners’ families: JENGbA (Joint Enterprise Not Guilty by Association)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll