header-logo header-logo

08 March 2024 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 8062 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

IPP & joint enterprise: left to languish?

Jon Robins on why we need more politicians willing to support unfashionable causes

How speedily ministers can act when the world watches on and an election looms. At the time of going to print, parliamentary draftsmen are bashing out unprecedented legislation for the mass exoneration of hundreds of subpostmasters. They have been shamed out of years of inaction by ITV’s brilliant drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office, broadcast early this year.

But how long does it take for politicians to address an injustice in normal circumstances—that is, in the face of political indifference, media disengagement and public complacency? There are thousands of people in prison who insist they shouldn’t be there. They are in prison as a result of two controversial (and very different) features of our justice system, both long identified as scandals: imprisonment for public protection (IPP) and joint enterprise.

The fight for reform is powered by two extraordinary campaigns by prisoners’ families: JENGbA (Joint Enterprise Not Guilty by Association)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll