header-logo header-logo

08 March 2024 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 8062 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

IPP & joint enterprise: left to languish?

Jon Robins on why we need more politicians willing to support unfashionable causes

How speedily ministers can act when the world watches on and an election looms. At the time of going to print, parliamentary draftsmen are bashing out unprecedented legislation for the mass exoneration of hundreds of subpostmasters. They have been shamed out of years of inaction by ITV’s brilliant drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office, broadcast early this year.

But how long does it take for politicians to address an injustice in normal circumstances—that is, in the face of political indifference, media disengagement and public complacency? There are thousands of people in prison who insist they shouldn’t be there. They are in prison as a result of two controversial (and very different) features of our justice system, both long identified as scandals: imprisonment for public protection (IPP) and joint enterprise.

The fight for reform is powered by two extraordinary campaigns by prisoners’ families: JENGbA (Joint Enterprise Not Guilty by Association)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll