header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
25 July 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Legal aid: an anniversary

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

David Burrows marks the birthday of legal aid with an examination of its history & how far we have strayed from it

Legal aid will be 70 years old next week on 30 July 2019. The original act—Legal Aid and Advice Act 1949—received Royal Assent on that day. The idea of legal help for poor people, however, in limited forms was known from medieval times. This article briefly traces the history of legal aid up to the 1949 Act, through to its heyday in the 1970s, and then its decline to its modern version in Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO 2012), with thanks to Legal Aid and Advice Under the Legal Aid Acts 1949 to 1964  (ADM Oulton and EJT Matthews, 1971).

The ‘first English [legal aid] statute’, say Matthews and Oulton, is a statute of 1495; though there was legislation in Scotland 70 years earlier. The 1495 statute was intended ‘to admit such persons as are poor to sue in forma pauperis’. Poor persons were not to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Read All
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll