header-logo header-logo

Legal aid boost for housing & immigration practitioners

09 July 2025
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Immigration & asylum , Housing
printer mail-detail
A proposed £20m boost for housing and immigration legal aid practitioners has been confirmed

The investment will increase overall spend by 24% on housing legal aid and by 30% on immigration and asylum legal aid, and is the first real-terms fees rise for 30 years.

According to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), it means the fixed fee for housing work will increase by 42% from £157 to £223 and the fixed fee for asylum legal help will increase by 35% from £413 to £559.

The MoJ said the investment will be implemented ‘as soon as operationally possible’.

However, Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘Our research has found that this work is simply not profitable for practitioners at present, indeed a 95% increase is needed to restore fees to 1996 levels.’

Both Atkinson and Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, urged the government to create an independent fee review body for legal aid.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll