header-logo header-logo

01 November 2013
Issue: 7583 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Legal aid campaigners call on Clegg

High-profile Liberal Democrat lawyers joined the Justice Alliance today to present Nick Clegg with a demand that he halt proposals to slash legal aid.

Prominent Lib Dem lawyers Philippe Sands, Dinah Rose QC and Jo Shaw joined with more than 100 organisations hand-delivering a signed letter to the party’s HQ. The Lib-Dem membership voted against the legal aid proposals, at conference.

The Justice Alliance has warned that the proposals could have knock-on costs of up to £47m, and says law firms are already having to turn away victims of domestic violence and trafficking because they no longer have enough resources to help them.

The government’s latest consultation, Transforming Legal Aid: Next Steps, ended today, 1 November. 

Dinah Rose QC said: “The protection of the right of access to justice ought to be fundamental to a party which values civil liberties. It is put in jeopardy by the government’s proposals to implement yet more cuts on legal aid. There is no point in participating in government unless the leadership uses the power that it undoubtedly has to prevent serious damage being done to our legal system, and to the rights of the poorest and most vulnerable members of our society."

 

Issue: 7583 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll