header-logo header-logo

04 November 2020
Issue: 7909 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid in dire straits

Legal aid services are on the brink of collapse, CILEx (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) has warned

Responding last week to the Justice Select Committee’s inquiry on ‘The future of legal aid’, CILEx said legal aid was already at a critical stage before the pandemic, with members reporting growing problems with recruitment and retention due to repeated government cuts and many firms moving away from the legal aid sector altogether. The COVID-19 pandemic has piled on further financial hardship.

CILEx President Craig Tickner, a specialist criminal defence advocate, said: ‘The precarious financial stability of legal aid firms pre-dates the current Covid crisis.

‘For as long as we can remember we have been calling for proper funding and additional resources, engaging with review processes such as the Criminal Legal Aid Review. With COVID-19 now hovering over remaining providers like the grim reaper, action is needed now. Any delay will be too late.’

In its response, the organisation warned that funding cuts caused by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) had disincentivised practitioners from working in legal aid and created ‘incessant court backlogs’ through under-resourcing the sector. Consequently, the legal aid market was ‘increasingly dependent on a limited pool of providers to provide an unrealistic level of output, worsened by new initiatives, such as extended opening hours for the court estate’.

As well as increased funding for legal aid work, CILEx called for earlier access to payment for legal aid work to help financially precarious firms, ‘In order to help safeguard income streams, manage risk and protect the financial longevity of providers in supplying legal aid services’.

The Justice Select Committee inquiry aims to look at the major challenges facing clients and providers, market sustainability, impact of COVID-19 and the increasing reliance on digital technology. Read more at: bit.ly/338AOxQ.

Issue: 7909 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll