header-logo header-logo

Legal aid in dire straits

04 November 2020
Issue: 7909 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail
Legal aid services are on the brink of collapse, CILEx (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) has warned

Responding last week to the Justice Select Committee’s inquiry on ‘The future of legal aid’, CILEx said legal aid was already at a critical stage before the pandemic, with members reporting growing problems with recruitment and retention due to repeated government cuts and many firms moving away from the legal aid sector altogether. The COVID-19 pandemic has piled on further financial hardship.

CILEx President Craig Tickner, a specialist criminal defence advocate, said: ‘The precarious financial stability of legal aid firms pre-dates the current Covid crisis.

‘For as long as we can remember we have been calling for proper funding and additional resources, engaging with review processes such as the Criminal Legal Aid Review. With COVID-19 now hovering over remaining providers like the grim reaper, action is needed now. Any delay will be too late.’

In its response, the organisation warned that funding cuts caused by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) had disincentivised practitioners from working in legal aid and created ‘incessant court backlogs’ through under-resourcing the sector. Consequently, the legal aid market was ‘increasingly dependent on a limited pool of providers to provide an unrealistic level of output, worsened by new initiatives, such as extended opening hours for the court estate’.

As well as increased funding for legal aid work, CILEx called for earlier access to payment for legal aid work to help financially precarious firms, ‘In order to help safeguard income streams, manage risk and protect the financial longevity of providers in supplying legal aid services’.

The Justice Select Committee inquiry aims to look at the major challenges facing clients and providers, market sustainability, impact of COVID-19 and the increasing reliance on digital technology. Read more at: bit.ly/338AOxQ.

Issue: 7909 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll