header-logo header-logo

01 February 2021
Issue: 7919 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Legal aid panel announced

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced the 18 members of the expert panel for its ongoing criminal legal aid review
The panel, led by former judge and chair of Linklaters global competition practice Sir Christopher Bellamy QC, will look into the long-term sustainability of the criminal legal aid system. It will begin meeting monthly in February, and Sir Christopher will present his recommendations to the Lord Chancellor later this year.

The members include former Criminal Law Solicitors Association chair Bill Waddington, Nottingham University professor Sue Arrowsmith, CILEx chair Professor Chris Jones, former Court of Appeal Criminal Division judge Baroness Hallett, UCL law professor Dame Hazel Genn and University of Law professor Stephen Mayson.

‘The review must focus on ensuring a criminal justice system that delivers a fair trial and justice for all, including defendants and victims,’ Law Society president David Greene said.

‘Legal aid practitioners must be paid properly, and their businesses must be economically viable, otherwise the system will collapse. Given that the review is just getting under way and any benefits arising from it appear some way off, there is still an urgent need for interim relief in order to provide the additional funds that criminal defence solicitors so desperately need.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll