header-logo header-logo

Legal aid proves popular with voters

18 January 2023
Issue: 8009 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession , Judicial review
printer mail-detail
Members of the public across the three main parties support legal aid, research has shown.

A poll of 2,000 people by the Law Society this month found 84% of Conservative, 95% of Labour and 97% of Liberal Democrat voters in agreement that legal aid is a good thing. It also revealed the public believe legal aid is more widely available than it actually is.

More than half (53%) thought legal aid is available for domestic violence cases, while 73% said it should be available—in fact it is available only if there is an injunction.

Some 44% thought legal aid is available for employment cases and 68% said it should be available, while in reality it is only available for discrimination cases. 42% thought it is available for rented housing issues and 66% said it should be available—in fact it is available only if living conditions are a threat to health or at repossession stage.

The research was conducted in the first week of January, the day after the Ministry of Justice announced the long-awaited civil legal aid review, which is due to publish its final report in 2024.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Services are collapsing now. We cannot afford to wait until 2024 for investment.’

Last week, the Law Society sent a letter before action to the Lord Chancellor, Dominic Raab, urging him to increase defence solicitors’ legal aid pay rates or face a judicial review.

Shuja said: ‘What is so frustrating is that a rational policy path was identified in Lord Bellamy’s comprehensive review and largely accepted, including 15% for barristers, but the key recommendation affecting solicitors—who were viewed as being in the most “parlous state”—was rejected.’

While Raab has claimed solicitors are being given a 15% rise, Law Society analysis of the offer found the increase actually amounted to 9%.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—Ed Williams

DWF—Ed Williams

Public sector disputes capability bolstered by partner hire in Leeds

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Firm strengthens corporate, real estate and insolvency teams with partner trio

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Consultant and solicitor join commercial real estate team

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll