header-logo header-logo

Legal ethics in question

27 April 2017 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

How should the fall-out from the Panama Papers be addressed by the legal profession, asks Geoffrey Bindman QC

The naming in the “Panama Papers” of those concerned in hiding fortunes in tax havens will continue to alarm a number of prominent law firms—in the UK and across the globe. A committee of the European Parliament is investigating alleged contraventions of EU law relating to money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion arising out of the disclosures. The conduct of an international network of lawyers is clearly at the heart of them. This should cause no surprise. As lawyers have played an increasing role in the highly competitive market economy it has become harder for them to maintain respect for professional standards which are stricter than those of their clients.

Elements of the Common Law

The struggle to maintain professional integrity is not new. Francis Bacon described it in the preface to his E lements of the Common Law in 1630.

“I hold every man a debtor to his profession, from the which as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll