header-logo header-logo

Legal ethics in question

27 April 2017 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

How should the fall-out from the Panama Papers be addressed by the legal profession, asks Geoffrey Bindman QC

The naming in the “Panama Papers” of those concerned in hiding fortunes in tax havens will continue to alarm a number of prominent law firms—in the UK and across the globe. A committee of the European Parliament is investigating alleged contraventions of EU law relating to money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion arising out of the disclosures. The conduct of an international network of lawyers is clearly at the heart of them. This should cause no surprise. As lawyers have played an increasing role in the highly competitive market economy it has become harder for them to maintain respect for professional standards which are stricter than those of their clients.

Elements of the Common Law

The struggle to maintain professional integrity is not new. Francis Bacon described it in the preface to his E lements of the Common Law in 1630.

“I hold every man a debtor to his profession, from the which as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll